Sunday, April 18, 2010

Weekly Torah Portion: Arcarei and Kedoshim


Acharei (אחרי — Hebrew for “after” or “after the death,” the fifth word or fifth and sixth words, and the first distinctive word or words, in the parshah) is the 29th weekly Torah portion. It constitutes Lev 16:1 to 18;30.

In common years (for example, 2010, 2012 etc.), parshah Acharei is combined with the next parshah, Kedoshim, to help achieve the needed number of weekly readings.

Kedoshim (קדושים — Hebrew for "holy ones,” the 14th word, and the first distinctive word, in the parshah) is the 30th parshah. It constitutes Lev 19:1 to 20:27

I do not pretend to understand the reasons for the many twists and turns of Jewish Law in Leviticus... but, perhaps this is the point... Maybe understanding is overrated at times...

I love that quote by Pascal, "The heart has it's reasons that the reason knows not of".

Solomon says it well, "Trust in the Lord with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding...".

Lev 20:26 And ye shall be holy unto Me; for I HaShem am holy, and have set you apart from the peoples, that ye should be Mine.

All the laws, rites, regulations, instructions...
the modern - rational mind seeks... rationales... perhaps there are none to be found... perhaps it's as simple as "this is how we Jews do life"... so I leave you with words and thoughts more eloquent than mine from a favorite writer of mine...

Why Does Judaism Make No Sense?

http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/1148059/jewish/Why-Does-Judaism-Make-No-Sense.htm

Question:

Yesterday, my sister threw out some scrambled eggs. I asked her why. She said because she accidentally mixed them with a spatula that was used for milk and the frying pan was used for meat and that meant the eggs were no good. I asked her why. She said because that's the halacha. I asked her why. She said, "Because."

There are so many things like this in the Jewish religion. Don't play musical instruments on Shabbat. Why? Because you might come to fix one. So what? You're not allowed. Why? Because. Don't mix wool and linen. Why? Because.

Tell me, rabbi, is this a sensible religion?

Response:

No, it is not. And your first mistake is to believe that Jews do these things for any particular reason. Jews do these things because they are Jews. Keeping kosher is not a reasonable act and neither is Shabbat or the prohibition against mixing wool and linen. The same with Torah readings, bar and bat mitzvahs, black leather boxes or dipping in the mikvah. These are neither rational nor religious acts—in the modern understanding of "religious." They do not speak to the modern mind because they are not of modernity. They are ancient tribal rituals, preserved by a people obsessed with their history and their tribalism.

A few words about tribalism as the sociologist sees it. Sociology became a science with the publication Emile Durkheim's monograph on suicide in 1897. Durkheim was a nice Jewish boy who had studied in yeshiva to become a rabbi, as his father, grandfather and great-grandfather before him, but then left to think for himself and challenge his teachers at the Sorbonne. In his paper, Durkheim blamed most of society's woes (especially suicide) on the abandonment of tribalism. He coined the term anomie, which means a state of society where nobody knows who they are, what they have to do with one another or what on earth they're doing here. Durkheim demonstrated, through the first methodological, scientific study of a social phenomenon, that in turn-of-the-century France, suicide was the realm of the tribeless—meaning the Protestant and the agnostic. Catholics and Jews rarely committed suicide. Because they felt no anomie.

What this runaway-yeshiva boy ironically demonstrated, and others after him confirmed is that a human being without a tribe is like a polar bear without ice—he can survive, but he'll be awfully confused. It's through his relationship with the tribe that a human being knows that the earth beneath his feet is solid ground, that tomorrow is a day like today, that he is who he is and it's okay to be that way. Take the tribe away and none of that remains necessarily true.

Ask any social worker: Take an aboriginal person off of skid row and plop him back in his tribe and he's a healthy specimen of life. Rip a wild kid out of that stolen vehicle and make him part of an extended, cohesive family and he calms down, becomes manageable.

Most social illnesses arose when society grew beyond the tribe. As Jared Diamond points out, tribes are egalitarian. It was chiefdoms and states that gave one man power over another. Communism, socialism, the checks and balances of the modern capitalist state—all of these are attempts to make up for the primal trauma that society experienced as it emerged from its cocoon of the tribe.

Which is the astonishing thing about the Jewish People: We never left the tribe behind. Actually, that is the best description I have of this enigma we call the Jewish People: A bronze age tribe residing smack at the vortex of modernity. That's also the best way for me to explain those rituals, sacred objects, sacred spaces and mystic occasions that are such an anathema to the modern mind: It's true—they are absurd within the framework of the rationalist mind, just as polar bears would be absurd hunting for walrus in the Sahara. Kosher garments, Shabbat technicalities and taboo scrambled eggs are downright bizarre outside the context of tribalness—as are the thrice daily incantations, the black leather boxes, the dip in the mikvah, the candles before sundown, perhaps the entire gamut of the Jewish experience. But tell me, just how much are you in love with the anomie of the modern mind? In Yeats' classic portrayal of the modern mess:

The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;

The center cannot hold because there is none. Because modern man is a figment of its own imagination. He defines himself, his world and his place within it each day anew according to the temperament of that day. He is his own point of reference, and therefore he has no center, only periphery.

Let's back up. What is the place of ritual within the tribe?

Richard Sosis, an anthropologist at the University of Connecticut, has put a lot of thought and research into this question and published prolifically on the topic. Sosis observed tribe members who maim their bodies in initiation rites, others who risk their lives in celebratory dances and even one particular middle eastern tribe in which male members would stand for hours shaking back and forth, dressed in fur hats and hot woolen clothes, reciting ancient incantations before a stone wall under the blazing sun of Jerusalem. Sosis was bothered by the seeming counter-productivity of these rituals. "Why," he asked, "does human society universally develop rituals that do not contribute, but rather, severely detract from reproduction and accumulation of food and resources?"

His answer: Rituals deal with something yet more essential, something that precedes the intellect. Rituals deal with identity, the context in which intellect functions. Identity in turn is the glue by which a tribe is held together. Specifically, Sosis demonstrates, we're speaking of rituals that are attributed meanings that cannot be falsified (read: can't prove it, can't disprove it), involve significant risk or sacrifice on the part of the individual ("too risky to fake") and are performed together or in concert with other members of the tribe. If there's no risk, you haven't proven anything to anyone, not even yourself. And if it all makes perfect sense, then you did it because it makes sense, not because of who you really are.

It's like bringing your wife flowers or buying her diamonds. Now does that make sense? Good money gone to waste on items that provide no utility. But that's just the point: If it would make sense to you, it would mean nothing to her. It's only when we do the irrational that we establish firm bonds of commitment and joint identity.

Within the Torah cosmology, non-falsifiable ritual has a yet greater place. The mitzvah-rituals not only bind the people together as a cohesive whole, but also bind the people to an underlying truth that is wholly transcendent and unknowable, sometimes known as G-d. That is really the essence of Jewishness, and the secret of Jewish survival as a tribe: The covenant. Yes, other tribes have their particular deities, totems and worships. But with the Jewish People, that covenant with the Unknowable Maker of Heaven and Earth is our defining truth. That is who we are and without it we are not.

So how do I establish, sustain and perpetuate a covenant with a transcendent, unknowable G-d? If I cannot affirm my commitment to another individual through something that I do because it makes perfect sense to me, all the more so I cannot establish an eternal bond with an infinite entity by means of cute little acts that fit neatly within my puny brain. The only true bond is through the super-rational. Like those black leather boxes on my arm and head.

Does that mean nothing is allowed to make sense? Not at all. This Infinite G-d desires a bond with the entirety of each one of us—with our hands, our feet, our hearts and, yes, even our brains. If nothing would make sense, then the brain and heart would be left out of the equation. So He provides opportunities to bond through mitzvahs that make sense as well, like don't steal, visit the sick, honor mom and dad. Even the ones that transcend reason—the ones we call chukim, such as the prohibition against wearing wool and linen mixed together or eating meat cooked with milk—these as well have been provided a kind of reasoning that works within a certain realm.

Yet nevertheless, when it comes down to the prime motivation for all of them, for everything Jewish a Jew does, it's because, "Hey, I'm a Jew and this is what Jews do." In other words, it comes down to our covenant with a G-d that we never quite figured out, and don't really expect to. But we do His stuff, because, hey, we're His tribe.

Like throwing out those eggs. It's a bonding experience. Do it with love.

Sunday, April 11, 2010

The Stairstep Psalms


I am currently reading the weekly Torah portions with little stirring... When I read the musings of my peeps I seek a stirring of the mind, heart and will... but, mainly of the heart...

I've been reading again this week in Peter Drucker and he emphasizes over and over that to be effective we must know our strengths and how we operate... How do we learn? How do we communicate? What are we good at?

In the realm of spirituality, as much as I love the intellectual side of things I am fundamentally a creature of the heart ("The heart has it's reasons that that the reason knows not of." see Pascal on the heart). It is emotion that moves me...

My mind and will may be the banks and bed of the river... but my heart is the water.

I have been seeking a paradigm shift in my approach to reading Torah... Torah study not as learning but as meeting... communing with the ground of my being... connecting anew... no, remembering- becoming aware again of the connection between the divine sparks at the core of my soul and the ultimate divine spark... A unity that persists regardless of whatever I may think, say or do.

As a side note... I think that this is why there is such emphasis in psalms and proverbs on blamelessness, being just, doing right... Not for some moralistic/ rewards-punishments kind of reason but rather because of potential connectivity issues (as we say in IT language)... G-d in us is inseparably connected to G-d above... but, evil and wrongdoing obscure and cloud the connection functionally... again, functionally, not relationally... G-d is always my mother and father- no matter what I do... but, when my way is blameless... when I am pure in heart I can see G-d and experience Her/ Him in my day to day.

Back to Torah... I can't understand why so much of the primary spiritual mother's milk and father's meat of the peeps (Torah) would focus on ritual, rite and things like how to address lesions and bodily fluid discharges (Leviticus)... Just don't get the rationale for granting the amount of time and attention to these matters given the very limited real estate that is the 5 books of Moses... I trust that with time this will make more sense to me...

I continue to read as part of my daily study/service Torah along with a psalm a day and a chapter from proverbs... Of late, the proverbs stir me... the psalms rarely do. This has not typically been the case over the past 30+ years.

Today I read the final psalm in the stair step psalms (Psalms 120-134)...

Chapter 134

1. A song of ascents. Behold: Bless the Lord, all you servants of the Lord who stand in the House of the Lord in the nights. 2. Lift up your hands in holiness and bless the Lord. 3. May the Lord, Who makes heaven and earth, bless you from Zion.

Many of the psalms can tend to ramble a bit for me these days (more a Jonathan issue than a psalms issue)... the stair step psalms are like industrial strength psalms... concentrate. Succinct... to the point. I love them... they stir me.

I like to use them as a "template" for a personalized prayer...

Oh Lord, bless you... bless you for all your goodness and faithfulness to me... I am your servant. My heart, mind and will stand at the ready in your house day and night for your call. I lift up my hands asking you to search my heart and expose any fault in me... May my way be pure and right... pleasing to you... in harmony with the natural order of things... the way the universe flows. Maker of all, source and ground of my being... I ask for your blessing on my way, my family, my life work. Lover of my being, may my love for you make real and enveloping that union that has existed since you first knew me...

I will be mulling over the songs of ascents this week... also, re-reading the story of king Hezekiah...

More about The Songs of Degrees (Ascents)
http://www.levendwater.org/companion/append67.html

There is no difference of opinion as to the meaning of the word "degrees". It means "steps", but interpretations of the use of the word in this connection manifest a great difference and discordance. Some think these Psalms were so called because they were sung on the fifteen steps of the Temple. But there is no evidence that there were fifteen steps. In Ezekiel's Temple (Ezek. 40:22, 31) there are to be two flights; one of seven steps in the outer court, and another of eight steps in the inner court. But that Temple is the subject of prophecy, and is still future.

Others suggest "a Song of the higher choir", "on the stairs of some high place"; others, "in a higher key". Others interpret them of "the going up of the Ark" to Zion; others, of "the going up of the tribes" to the feasts; others, "a Song of high degree". Others refer them to "a synthetic arrangement of the parallel lines"; others, that they refer to "the going up from Babylon", which makes them all "post-exilic". Others regard them as referring to the yet future return of Israel from their long dispersion; while yet others spiritualize all the expressions, and interpret them of the experiences of the Church of God at all times, and in the present day.

One thing is clear, i.e. that all these interpretations cannot be correct. So we still look for one which shall be worthy of the dignity of the Word of God as "written for our learning"; and one which shall produce and combine intellectual enjoyment with experimental satisfaction. Dr. Thirtle (*1) has called attention to the use of the definite article. The Hebrew reads "A Song of THE Degrees" (Shir hamma'aloth). In this simple fact lies the key to the solution of the problem, which is as simple in its nature as it is grand in its results.

Once we note the use of the definite article, "THE Degrees", we naturally ask what Degrees? The answer comes from the Word of God itself, and not from the guesses and imaginations of men. The only "degrees" of which we read in the Bible are "the degrees" on the sundial of Ahaz, by which the shadow of the sun went backward in the days of his son Hezekiah, as a sign from Jehovah that he should recover from his sickness, while Jerusalem was surrounded by the armies of the king of Assyria, and Hezekiah was under sentence of death from the King of Terrors (see 2Kings 20:8-11, and the Structure of the chapters in Isa. 36-39). Scripture knows of no other steps or "degrees" that can be connected with the shadow of the sun.

On recovery from his sickness, Hezekiah said (Isa. 38:20) :

"Jehovah was ready to save me :
Therefore we will sing MY SONGS (*2) to the stringed instruments
All the days of our life
In the house of Jehovah." (*3)

More than 250 years ago (1602-75) this interpretation was suggested in a passing remark by Dr. John Lightfoot in his work on Old Testament Chronology : but so far as Dr. Thirtle is concerned, it was his own independent discovery. The number of these Psalms (fifteen) adds to its testimony to the certainty of this interpretation. It corresponds with the number of the years (fifteen), which were added to Hezekiah's life : while the number written by himself (ten) corresponds with the number of "the degrees" by which "the shadow of the sun went backward".

Hezekiah called them "MY songs". There was no need to put his own name to them, but he put the names to the other five. The one by Solomon is in the center, with two by David on either side. In each of the seven Psalms (on either side of the central Psalm) the name "Jehovah" occurs twenty-four times, and "Jah" twice (once in the third Psalm of each seven). In the central Psalm, "Jehovah" occurs three times.

There are five groups consisting of three Psalms each. The first of each group has Distress for its subject; the second has Trust in Jehovah; while the third has Blessing and peace in Zion. In the notes on these Psalms, the passages in the Kings, Chronicles, and Isaiah, to which they refer, are carefully supplied : the passages in the historical books also are referred to in these Psalms. Here we give, in order, the facts of Hezekiah's history which are referred to in these Psalms. These fifteen points of contact can be used in connection both with the Psalms and the historical books.

We have noted fifteen events in the life of Hezekiah which find their counterpart, and are celebrated, in these fifteen Psalms. Space forbids our giving here more that the bare references. Further details will be found in the notes in the historical books, the prophet Isaiah, and the Psalms in question.

Saturday, April 10, 2010

The Mystic Dean Moriarty


The Mystic Dean Moriarty
from the Gospel According to Kerouac

Everything since the Greeks has been predicated wrong.

"Now this is the first time we've been alone and in a position to talk for years," said Dean. And he talked all night. As in a dream, we were zooming back through sleeping Washington and back in the Virginia wilds, crossing the Appomattox River at daybreak, pulling up at my brother's door at eight A.M. And all this time Dean was tremendously excited about everything he saw, everything he talked about, every detail of every moment that passed. He was out of his mind with real belief. "And of course now no one can tell us that there is no God. We've passed through all forms. You remember, Sal, when I first came to New York and I wanted Chad King to teach me about Nietzsche. You see how long ago? Everything is fine, God exists, we know time. Everything since the Greeks has been predicated wrong. You can't make it with geometry and geometrical systems of thinking. It's all this!" He wrapped his finger in his fist; the car hugged the line straight and true. "And not only that but we both understand that I couldn't have time to explain why I know and you know God exists." At one point I moaned about life's troubles-how poor my family was, how much I wanted to help Lucille, who was also poor and had a daughter. "Troubles, you see, is the generalization-word for what God exists in. The thing is not to get hung-up. My head rings!" he cried, clasping his head. He rushed out of the car like Groucho Marx to get cigarettes- that furious, ground-hugging walk with the coattails flying, except that he had no coattails. "Since Denver, Sal, a lot of things- Oh, the things-I've thought and thought. I used to be in reform school all the time, I was a young punk, asserting myself-stealing cars a psychological expression of my position, hincty to show. All my jail-problems are pretty straight now. As far as I know I shall never be in jail again. The rest is not my fault." We passed a little kid who was throwing stones at the cars in the road. "Think of it," said Dean. "One day he'll put a stone through a man's windshield and the man will crash and die-all on account of that little kid. You see what I mean? God exists without qualms. As we roll along this way 1 am positive beyond doubt that everything will be taken care of for us-that even you, as you drive, fearful of the wheel" (I hated to drive and drove carefully)-"the thing will go along of itself and you won't go off the road and I can sleep. Furthermore we know America, we're at home; I can go anywhere in America and get what I want because it's the same in every corner, I know the people, I know what they do. We give and take and go in the incredibly complicated sweetness zigzagging every side." There was nothing clear about the things he said, but what he meant to say was somehow made pure and clear. He used the word "pure" a great deal. I had never dreamed Dean would become a mystic. These were the first days of his mysticism, which would lead to the strange, ragged W. C. Fields saintliness of his later days.
~Jack Kerouac "On the Road"